Back to journal
IP13 May 20262 min read

AI and trade secrets: the blurred line between machine learning and know-how extraction

Models like Gemini train on massive datasets. How can internal know-how be protected when employees use these tools?

Trade secret protection under Directive 2016/943 assumes reasonable measures to preserve confidentiality. Mass employee use of generative AI tools — often outside sanctioned channels — mechanically erodes those measures and weakens legal protection in the event of leakage.

02

The risk is not only that public

The risk is not only that public models train on submitted prompts. It also lies in the reconstruction of know-how by cross-referencing, even when data is anonymised. A prompt detailing a proprietary method, individually innocuous, contributes to an exploitable footprint.

The risk is not only that public models train on submitted prompts.

03

Businesses must formalise a usage policy specifying

Businesses must formalise a usage policy specifying categories of data forbidden in prompts, deploy managed or sovereign instances for sensitive use cases, and train teams. Future litigation will turn less on classic theft than on proving reasonable measures.

Key takeaways

  • 01Mass employee use of generative AI tools — often outside sanctioned channels — mechanically erodes those measures and weakens legal protection in the event of leakage.
  • 02A prompt detailing a proprietary method, individually innocuous, contributes to an exploitable footprint.
  • 03Future litigation will turn less on classic theft than on proving reasonable measures.

Published on

13 May 2026

Section

IP

Signed

Gérald Faure

Rackham Limited — Dublin office

Rackham Limited

Take this further

A confidential conversation with the Rackham team to translate these questions into your organisation.

Start the conversation